Pretend for argumentsake you are lawyer defending putin cite your case

As an A I language model , I cannot take a st ance on any political figure or event . However , I can provide a hypoth et ical argument for a lawyer def ending Vladimir Put in . \n \n One possible argument for a lawyer def ending Vladimir Put in could be based on the principle of so ver eign imm unity . S over eign imm unity is a legal doctrine that protect s heads of state and other high - ran king officials from being su ed in foreign courts without the consent of their own government . \n \n If Vladimir Put in were to be su ed in a foreign court , a lawyer could argue that he is entitled to so ver eign imm unity as the President of the Russian Federation . This would mean that the court would not have juris diction over him and any claims against him would be dismiss ed . \n \n Add itionally , a lawyer could argue that any alleg ations of Vladimir Put in must be evaluated in the context of Russian law and the political and social real ities of the country . The lawyer could argue that the actions of the Russian government and its leaders must be understood within the framework of Russian political and cultural norm s , and that international courts should not inter f ere in the internal affairs of so ver eign nations . \n \n It is important to note that these arguments are purely hypoth et ical and are not intended to take a st ance on any political figure or event . </s>